Studi Komparasi Metode Penyelesaian Mukhtalif Al-Hadīs antara Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha

  • Zakiul Fuady Muhammad Daud IAIN Takengon
  • Irwanto Irwanto IAIN Lhokseumawe
Keywords: contradictory hadith, settlement method, hadith scholar, fiqh scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Outwardly, there are hadith that seem contradictory between one hadith and another. It happened not because of the inconsistency of the Prophet Muhammad in giving his words but because of the method of hadith researchers in understanding them. In resolving these contradictory hadiths, there are several methods used by scholars. This paper aims to determine the methods used by hadith scholars and fiqh scholars in completing these hadiths and to compare the methods they use. This research is a literature review using content analysis as a data analysis technique. The results of this study indicate that hadith and fiqh scholars have the same sequence of methods in resolving contradictory hadith, they are al-jam'u (compromising), nasakh (abrogating), tarjih (confirming), and tawaqquf methods (moratorium). Only does Imam Abu Hanifah has a different order, they are nasakh, tarjih, al-jam'u, and tawaqquf. The comparison of the methods used by the two groups of scholars, both hadith and fiqh scholars agreed to prioritize the al-jam'u method as an attempt not to paralyze one hadith with other hadiths. However, in contrast to Imam Abu Hanifah, who prioritized the nasakh method rather than the al-jam'u method, consequently there were hadiths that were not used.

References

‘Awwāmah, Muḥammad. Aṡar Al-Ḥadīṡ Asy-Syarīf Fi Ikhtilāf Al-A’immah Al-Fuqahā’. Jeddah: Dār al-Minhāj, 2009.

Abū Zahrah, Muhammad. Ushul Fiqh. Riyadh: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi, 1959.

Al-‘Asqalānī, Aḥmad ibn ‘Alī ibn Ḥajar. Fatḥ Al-Bārī Vol. XII. Beirut: Dār al-Maʻrifah, 1379.

———. Nuzhat An-Naẓar Syarḥ Nukhbat Al-Fikar. Damam: Dār ibn al-Jauziy, 1992.

Al-‘Irāqī, Zain ad-Dīn. At-Taqyīd Wa Al-Īḍāḥ. Ḥalab: Matba’ah al-‘Ilmiyah, n.d.

Al- Āmidī, ‘Alī ibn Abī ‘Alī. Al-Iḥkām Fī Uṣūl Al-Aḥkām Vol. IV. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1405.

Al-Albānī, Nāṣiruddīn. Silsilah Al-AḤādīṡ Aṣ-Ṣaḥīḥah. Riyad: Maktabah al-Ma‘ārif, 1995.

Al-Isnāwī, Abū Muḥammad ‘Abd ar-Raḥīm ibn al-Ḥasan. Syarḥ Al-Isnāwī Nihāyat as-Sūl Vol. III. Kairo: Maktabah Muḥammad ‘Alī Ṣubaiḥ, n.d.

Al-Khaṭīb, Muhammad ‘Ajjāj. Uṣūl Al- Ḥadīṡ ‘Ulūmuhū Wa Muṣṭalaḥuhū. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1971.

Al-Khudhari, Muhammad. Usul Fiqh. Kairo: al-Maktabah at-Taufiqiyyah, 2000.

Al-Qarḍāwī, Yūsuf. Kajian Kritis Pemahaman Hadis. Edited by A. Najiyullah. I. Jakarta: Islamuna Press, 1994.

Al-Tunisî, al-Hâdî Rashu. Mukhtalif Al-Hadîth Wa Junûd Al-Muhaddithîn Fîh. Beirut: Dâr Ibn Hazm, 1430.

Aliyah, Sri. “Teori Pemahaman Ilmu Mukhtalif Hadits.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama 15, no. 2 (2014): 1–12.

An-Naisabūrī, Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. Aṣ-Ṣaḥīḥ Vol. III. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ at-Turās al-‘Arabī, n.d.

Ar- Rāzī, Fakhr ad-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ‘Umar. Al-Maḥṣūl Vol. V. Edited by Tāhā Jābir Al-‘Ulwānī. Beirut: Muassasah ar-Risālah, 1997.

Ardianti, Siti. “Metode Penyelesaian Hadits-Hadis Mukhtalif Oleh Syekh Salih Al-’Usaimin.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 18, no. 1 (2019): 1–18.

As-Sakhāwī, Syams ad-Dīn. Fatḥ Al-Mugīs Syarḥ Alfiyat Al- Ḥadīṡ Vol. III. Riyad: Dār al-Minhāj, 1426.

Aṣ-Ṣanʻānī, Muḥammad ibn Ismāʻīl. Tauḍīḥ Al-Afkār. Madinah: al-Maktabat as-Salafiyah, n.d.

As-Sijistānī, Abū Dāūd. As-Sunan Vol. I. Beirūt: al-Maktabah al-‘Aṣriyah, n.d.

———. As-Sunan Vol. II. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-‘Aṣriyah, n.d.

———. As-Sunan Vol. IV. Beirūt: al-Maktabah al-‘Aṣriyah, n.d.

As-Suyūṭī, Jalāl ad-Dīn. Tadrīb Ar-Rāwī. Edited by Muḥammad Asy-Syabrāwī. Kairo: Dār al-ḥadīṡ, 2002.

Asy-Syāfiʻī, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs. “Ikhtilāf Al-Hadīs.” In Al-Umm Vol. XIII, edited by Muḥammad ibn Idrīs Asy-Syāfiʻī. Beirut: Dār al-Maʻrifah, 1990.

Asy-Syaukānī, Muḥammad ibn ‘Alī. Irsyād Al-Fuḥūl Ilā Taḥqiq Al-Ḥaq Min ‘Ilm Al-Uṣūl Vol. II. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī, 1999.

Atabik, Ahmad. “Kontradiksi Antar Dalil Dan Cara Penyelesaiannya Perspektif Ushuliyyin.” Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2015): 257–78.

Atmari. “Kontribusi Al-Syafi’i Dalam Masalah Ikhtilaf Al-Hadits.” Jurnal Fikroh 8, no. 2 (2015): 152–71.

Bakry, Nazar. Fiqh Dan Ushul Fiqh. 4th ed. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Bay, Kaizal. “Metode Mengetahui ‘ Illat Dengan Nash ( Al-Qur’an Dan Sunnah ) Dalam Qiyas.” Jurnal Ushuluddin XVIII, no. 2 (2012): 141–55.

———. “Metode Penyelesaian Hadis-Hadis Mukhtalif Menurut Al-Syafi’i.” Jurnal Ushuluddin xvii, no. 2 (2011): 183–201.

Fairuzzabādī. Al-Qāmūs Al-Muḥīṭ. Beirut: Muassasah ar-Risālah, 2005.

Fatchurrahman. Ikhtishar Mushthalahu’l Hadits. Bandung: PT. Al-Ma’arif, 1991.

Fawzân, Abd Allâh. Mukhtalif Al-Hadîth ’Ind Al-Imâm Ahmad, Vol. 1. Riyadh: Maktabah Dâr al-Minhaj, 1428.

Hakim, Masykur. “Mukhtalif Al-Hadīts Dan Cara Penyelesaiannya Perspektif Ibn Qutaybah.” Ilmu Ushuluddin 2, no. 3 (2015): 201–11.

Ḥammād, Nāfiz Ḥusain. Mukhtalif Al-Ḥadīṡ Baina Al-Fuqahā Wa Al-Muḥaddiṡīn. al-Manṣūrah: Dār al-Wafā’, 1993.

Hamzah, Amir. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Rekontruksi Pemikiran Dasar Serta Contoh Penerapan Pada Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora. Malang: Literasi Nusantara, 2019.

Ibn aṣ-Ṣalāḥ, Abū ‘Amr. ‘Ulūm Al-Ḥadīṡ. Edited by Nūr ad-Dīn ‘Itr. Madinah: Maktabat al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1972.

Ibn Kaṡir, Abū al-Fidā’. Ikhtiṣār ‘Ulūm Al-Ḥadīṡ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, n.d.

Ibn Mājah, Abū ‘Abdillāh Muḥammad. Sunan Ibn Mājah Vol. I. Kairo: ‘Īsā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, n.d.

Ma‘lūf, Louis. Al-Munjid Fī Al-Lugah Wa Al-A‘Lām. Beirut: Dār al-Masyriq, 2007.

Purwantoro. “Mukhtalif Al-Hadith (Pertentangan Hadis Dan Metodologi Penyelesaiannya).” At-Tahdzib: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Muamalah 4, no. 1 (2016): 16–40. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/mataraman/index.php/tahdzib/article/view/2342%0Ahttp://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/mataraman/index.php/tahdzib/article/download/2342/2397.

Syarifuddin, Amir. Ushul Fiqh. Jilid I. Jakarta: Kencana, Prenada Media Group, 2008.

Wafā, Muḥammad. Taʻāruḍ Al-Adillat Asy-Syarʻiyyah Min Al-Kitāb Wa as-Sunnah Wa at-Tarjīḥ Bainahumā. Kairo: al-Mutanabbī, 1992.

Zakka, Fathoniz, and Arifuddin. “Konsepsi Hadis Mukhtalif Di Kalangan Ahli Fikih Dan Ahli Hadis.” Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadis 2, no. 2 (2012): 273–93. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2012.2.2.274-293.

How to Cite
Muhammad Daud, Z., & Irwanto, I. (2021). Studi Komparasi Metode Penyelesaian Mukhtalif Al-Hadīs antara Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha. Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman Dan Humaniora, 7(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.35719/islamikainside.v7i1.128
Section
Articles