Relasi Pemikiran Nabia Abbott dan Ignaz Goldziher dalam Studi Ḥadīth

  • Arofatul Muawanah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam al-Yasini Pasuruan
Keywords: Relationship; ḥadīth; orientalists

Abstract

Among the Orientalists, who have different ideas, are Ignaz Goldziher and Nabia Abbott. In his study, Goldziher always show a sharp criticism of the scientific construction of ḥadÄ«th and his views on ḥadÄ«th have been always dissimilar with scholars of ḥadÄ«th. He also alleges that the existence of ḥadÄ«th is no longer original. Abbott’s thought of ḥadÄ«th, in contrast, tends to be moderate. Broadly speaking, Abbott’s views seem to reinforce the thought of ‘ulamÄ’ al-ḥadÄ«th. Abbott even acknowledges that the compilation of ḥadÄ«th has existed since the Prophet Muhammad’s lifetime. In this context, it is interesting to note that Goldziher and Abbott are equally orientalists who employ the Western paradigm in examining ḥadÄ«th. The question is whether there is a relationship of thought between the two. Using descriptive and analytical methods this article specifically traces and explores the relationship of Abbott and Goldziher’s thoughts. The study aims to determine the extent to which the relation of thought between the two Orientalists and the factors affect the similarity of thought between them.

References

Abbott, Nabia. Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri I: Historical Text. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
-----. Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri II: Qur’anic Commentary and Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Bukhārī (al), Muḥammad b. Ismā’īl Abū ‘Abd Allāh. al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ, Vol. 12. Beirut: Dār Ibn Kathīr, 1407.
Chalil, Moenawar. Kelengkapan Tarikh Nabi Muhammad. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2001.
Dīn (al), ‘Itr, Nūr. Manhaj al-Naqd fī ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1981.
Goldziher, Ignaz. Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law. New Jersey: Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.
Goldziher, Ignaz. Muslim Studies: Muhammedanische Studien, Vol. 2. Chicago: State University of New York Press, 1971.
Idri. “Perspektif Orientalis tentang Hadis Nabi: Telaah Kritis dan Implikasinya terhadap Eksistensi dan Kehujjahannya”, al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, Vol. 11, No. 1, Mei 2011.
-----. Studi Hadis (Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup, 2010.
‘Itr, Nūr al-Dīn. Manhaj al-Naqd fī ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1981.
Mahdi, Muhsin. Nabia Abbott. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, t.th.
Maloush, Talal. “Early Hadīth Literature and The Theory of Ignaz Goldziher”. Tesis--Studies Faculty of Arts University of Edinburgh, 2000.
Manẓūr, Muḥammad b. Mukram b. Lisān al Arāb, Vol. 12. Beirut: Dār al-Ṣādir, t.th.
Masrur, Ali. Teori Common Link G.H.A. Juynboll: Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadits. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2007.
Qurṭubī (al), ‘Abd Allāh b. Muḥammad b. Aḥmad al-Anṣārī. al-Jāmi‘ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān, Vol. 7. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1995.
Schacht, Joseph. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.
Shiddiqi, Muhammad Zubaiyr. Hadīth Literature. Cambridge: The Islamic Texts Society, 1993.
Ṭabarī (al), Muḥammad b. Jarīr. Jāmi‘ al-Bayān fī Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān, Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār al Fikr, 1988.
Ya’kub, Ali Mustafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2004.
Zamzami, Mukhammad. “Kritik terhadap Relasi Antagonistis Timur-Barat”, Religio: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2015.
How to Cite
Muawanah, A. (2017). Relasi Pemikiran Nabia Abbott dan Ignaz Goldziher dalam Studi Ḥadīth. Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman Dan Humaniora, 3(2), 143-164. Retrieved from http://islamikainside.iain-jember.ac.id/index.php/islamikainside/article/view/41
Section
Articles